EVE Search - Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 11 post(s)
Lilith Velkor Minmatar DEATH'S LEGION Red Box.	Posted - 2009.03.04 19:28:00 - [1] Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 04/03/2009 19:29:09 Originally by: McDaddy Pimp u forgot one thing Loki: Crap. Nope, its a great ship if you fly it the minmatar way. Still, some things I'd like to see addressed: -> offensive subsystem 2: please please please give us 5% bonus to optimal+falloff at least, as the 2.5% from optimal is pretty much vanishing completely if you fit ACs. Pretty please -> cpu output: it is a bit lacking, even with a basic pvp fit that isnt uber in any way I run into severe cpu issues (that is, with 4 cpu-neutral modules in lows...), shield tanking is really hard on it
Lilith Velkor Minmatar DEATH'S LEGION Red Box.	Posted - 2009.03.04 20:14:00 - [2] Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 04/03/2009 20:15:25 Originally by: MotherMoon nozh, shouldn't the minmatar shield rep bonus instead be a cap ammount bonus? The ammar don't need anymore cap to run thier junky armor tanks. Engineering subsystem 1 gives decent capacitor, and engineering 2 gives cap recharge. Quote: another issue, The minmatar defensive module which allows for a boost in remote rep is great, but the minmatar cruisers CPU limits it to only being able to fit one remote rep. Indeed, cpu output could be upped a bit, it is very tight, not only for remote reps but also to actually fit shield boosters.
Lilith Velkor Minmatar DEATH'S LEGION Red Box.	Posted - 2009.03.04 20:41:00 - [3] Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 04/03/2009 20:43:20 Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 04/03/2009 20:41:18 Originally by: J Valkor If you look back the bonus was changed to 5% fall off only on the internal servers already. sighs in relief Nice to hear, how did you find that out btw? Edit: Heh, I suppose I fail and its in this thread Yes, I fail, its one page back
Lilith Velkor Minmatar DEATH'S LEGION Red Box.	Posted - 2009.03.04 23:56:00 - [4] Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 04/03/2009 23:57:01 Originally by: MotherMoon currently there is no reason to shield tank over armor tank becuase of the CPU. maybe a new bonus with the shield boosting module? I'm actually shield tanking it (cant stand armor tanks), although its a passive buffer. With the shield module I get >10k buffer with ok-ish resist while only using 2 slots for extenders, leaving one for MWD and 3 for tackle. Its ok in my book, but I'm more into versatile setups than just mindlessly boosting one stat into the sky, as this doesnt help you in pvp at all. Give me a tad bit extra CPU (+50 maybe) and I'll be able to mount a X-Large booster tank just fine, or stick some dmg mods into lows instead of nanos.
Lilith Velkor Minmatar DEATH'S LEGION Red Box.	Posted - 2009.03.05 04:12:00 - [5] Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 05/03/2009 04:12:43 Originally by: Jack Jombardo And Lokis web-range bonus must be cut to 10% as it has the same range as the EW-frig -> absolut no reason to bring a Hyena anymore. Who does fly the Hyena anyway? It is completely obsoleted by the Rapier/Huginn in case you didnt notice. Or are you suggesting people fly the Hyena because they dont want their webs at 40km?
Lilith Velkor Minmatar DEATH'S LEGION Red Box.	Posted - 2009.03.05 22:09:00 - [6] Originally by: Jack Jombardo Flying a Hyena (all EW-ships) is a nice startup for new Player without 50 million SP and compareble cheap. Yes, you can bring Intis or other Frigs but still EW-Frigs are nice steps towards Recons. Or did you had 100+ mil ISK left to throw away as you started EvE and less then 10 mil SP with just one account/toon? Tbh I still dont get your issue. The Loki is definitely gonna cost more than a Huginn, so if the Huginn with its 40km webs doesnt obsolete the Hyena, the 22km webs on Loki wouldnt either. And if you havent enough SP/isk to fly a Huginn, then you wont fly a Loki either, so there is no problem. 22km is pretty much perfect imho, enough to be not useless, and not too much to obsolete the Recons.
Lilith Velkor Minmatar DEATH'S LEGION Red Box.	Posted - 2009.03.07 15:26:00 - [7] Originally by: IceAero Edited by: IceAero on 07/03/2009 14:24:47 It is impossible for a proteus to have 4 low slots, yet very possible on a few different Legion configurations. Isn't that..wrong? :( Depending on what you put together, you can have a 7-turret Loki which armor tanks with 3 lows. If you sacrifice turrets however you can have a halfdecent armor tank. Not every option makes sense, and if you absolutely want to have those 7 turrets you'll usually have to make a sacrifice regarding the slot layout, and work around the weakness you just created.
Lilith Velkor Minmatar DEATH'S LEGION Red Box.	Posted - 2009.03.09 00:28:00 - [8] Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 09/03/2009 00:29:09 Originally by: Elrinarie Ejecting means you do not get an insurance payout. No insurance on as expensive as these ships are going to be (from what we can see so far at least) or real life DAYS spent re-training. Insurance is not that much of an issue, see t2 ships. If you fly these, you are fully aware its gonna cost you if it gets destroyed. As the base hull cost also justifies putting faction or deadspace mods on it, insurance is a non-issue really, if I just lost 500-800mill in ship and fittings 50mill insurance payout is not gonna save me. /also wondering when the missing subsystems gonna be seeded, I'm itching to try the changed engineering sections and bonuses
Lilith Velkor Minmatar DEATH'S LEGION Red Box.	Posted - 2009.03.09 20:29:00 - [9] Any chance all the subsystems can get seeded again? I'd really like to test out the stuff, dont care if it changes again, just want to try out for my fitting ideas if its going to work out or not.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.